/asp/ - Alternative Sports & Wrestling
What is your opinion on recent Disney movies and the studio itself?
3D animation is an unfortunate aberration that is inferior in all aspects to traditional hand-drawn 2D.
Zootopia is the funnest movie I've ever seen.
>>67179218Zootopia was pretty nice. I also liked InsideOut. I think they really do solid kidmovies.>>67179268fag
Zootopia is the unfunnest movie I've ever seen.
>>67179511All the funny scenes were shown in trailers
Tbh I think that I want to fuck that rabbit
>>67179511>the unfunnest movie I've ever seenDOUBT
>>67179511Its not a comedy though? Mr. Big and Flash are only comedic characters
>>67179218I think I want to watch that movie
WHY CANT I POST WEBMS WITH SOUND???!/tv/ - Television & Film/tv/ - Television & Film/tv/ - Television & Filmthis is so retarded
>>67179831>this is so retarded>4chan
>There are people on this board who enjoy children's animated moviesNot being edgy. It's literally unwatchable for me. Not funny. Not dramatic. Not entertaining.
>>67179268I agree. 2D animation is much less restrictive in my opinion.
>>67179885yeah, but I wanted to make it more retarded>>994144but srs., there would be so many possibilities to discuss films better
>>67179896I once was a teaching assistant for a CS course, and all of the other TAs were obsessed with recent Disney movies. It honestly makes no sense to me that grown men and women would choose to watch cartoons made for children. They fucking sang the songs.
>>67181042More like dogfucker
>>67179218Why is the fox so smug bros?
>>67181198because Disney cannot into facial animation
>>67181198Shakira told them to make her character's hips bigger and Jason Smugman asked for the fox to look as smug as possible
>>67179831just make a fucking crosslinking thread on /gif/ or /wsg/ and link to the webums you want people to seeif they aren't cancerous phoneposters they can just hover over the link and watch the webm with sound without actually navigating to another board>>>/wsg/992855
>>67180083Feminization of culture fám
>>67179896I like some of the older ones like snow white, pinocchio, sleeping beauty but yeah, generally they are boring as hell and predictable.
>>67179218Big Hero 6 and Zootopia were very good and they've redeemed themselves after the lazy copy-paste job they did with FrozenTangled was good too.
>>67179218I'm still waiting for normal version, because watching CAM and RIP isn't really my pair of shoes
>>67183310same here man
>>67179218They haven't been in such a good spot since the early 90s, hell it might end up being better than that and Pixar's best years if the next few movies keep the quality. But the fact that they greenlit a Frozen 2 as soon as possible and they have the same management as Pixar makes me worried its eventually going to drown in sequels and prequels.
>>67182857What about Bust-it Billy Bob?
>>67179218>That slight stare towards his dick.They all knew what they were up too. Absolutely disgusting.
>>67179218Most aren't brilliant but this was by far their best in a long while.
>tfw Disney is making better 3D movies than PixarWhat went wrong?
>>67179218Too much like ABC TV.Badly requires a change of direction.
Somehow 2010s Disney is better than 2010s Pixar
>>67183539Completely another league, unlike all the aforementioned shite.
>>67185445Pixar kind of lost its way, and I think Disney mining them for talent is part of that. The Pixar name alone is still enough to get those sweet Academy statuettes.
>>67185492>>67185445Maybe all the good Pixar people went to Disney proper?
>>67185510This. I watched Destroy-it-Darrel and enjoyed it so much I was hyped about animated movies, thinking I found something to watch that gives me joy again, I remembered my love for movies. Then I saw Big Hero 6.
>>671792683D has a lot going for it but there's a simple beauty to 2D that has been left behind when you go from concept art to 3D models that makes me wish PatF had done so much better so Disney would make 2D films again.
Anyone have high hopes for Moana
>>67185663NoIt's going to be shit and a flop
>>67185663Why is her sidekick so fucking ugly?It's one thing to have distinct and nonattractive features in a secondary character but goddamn he's actually painful to look at. He's not even Quasimodo-tier, which is ugly but in an endearing way. This is downright distracting.
>>67179218Can Obama's last action please be the creation of a law that allows us to lapidate furrys, including pokemon fuckers?
>>67185663>>67185780It's going to suffer from the same thing The Good Dinosaur did. That art style is actually unpleasant to look at, which I think affects people's desire to see a movie quite a lot.
>>67185843There's literally nothing wrong with liking cute animals. And yeah, if you incidentally want to fuck them too, who cares? It's 2016, let go of your outdated prejudices already.
>>67185911Honestly I don't think there's anything wrong with wanting to fuck the bunny on the basis that she was designed to be fuckable.
>>67186086I don't know. With Rapunzel, Redhead Rapunzel and Ice Rapunzel you can tell they're supposed to be fuckable, even if that wasn't a conscious design decision. They're attractive young women so it goes without saying. With Rabunzel it's harder to tell because she's an animal, and not like an animal head on a woman's body like Maid Marian or anything, but a straight up animal walking upright. It might just be the recycling of the design conventions used to make the Rapunzels that came before her that reminds people of those fuckable human characters and thus inadvertently making her fuckable by association.
>>67186458It's not association but yes, it is the design, and that design is absurdly large, expressive eyes and small noses and mouths.
>>67179831Cause people will make screamers
>>67179268>3D animation is an unfortunate aberration that is inferior in all aspects to traditional hand-drawn 2D.3D modeling can be fine, heck you can even make it look 2D if you have competent people.https://youtu.be/yhGjCzxJV3E?t=1m38s
>>67186648Hips! The bunny has hips!